Сorevias
  • Interior News
  • Stylish Home
  • Auto Maintenance
  • Auto News
  • Auto insurance
Subscribe
  • Interior News
  • Stylish Home
  • Auto Maintenance
  • Auto News
  • Auto insurance
No Result
View All Result
Сorevias
Subscribe
No Result
View All Result

Is the Chevrolet 348 a Truck Engine?

by
in Auto News
0

If you really want to irk a Chevy enthusiast, call the 348 V8 a truck engine. It’s sometimes said to be provocative but, more often than not, it’s promoted as gospel. Scour the Internet and you’ll find many references claiming the 348 was a truck engine. Is that true, or just an epithet?

(Image courtesy of Chevrolet)

When Chevrolet introduced the small-block V8 for 1955, it was becoming apparent to market-watchers that the car-buying public was clamoring for more and more V8s. Upgrading engines for model-year updates was becoming an expensive proposition, as there had been rising demand for components like automatic transmission and air conditioning. Chevrolet wanted to plan for its future needs without expensive modifications that could also compromise the integrity of the engine design. Optimum low-end torque and mid-range performance was another consideration. “The W engine is different from the standpoint o[ being designed specifically to provide for future increases in displacement and compression ratio to meet yearly modification changes without the need for major redesign and the usual retooling required to provide the manufacturing equipment necessary to produce the engine,” wrote engineers in the article “Development of the Chevrolet W Engine: A New Concept in V-8 Engine Design” in General Motors Engineering Journal, Volume 5, Number 3.

(Image courtesy of General Motors)

Initially, Chevrolet played with several small-block designs to investigate the viability of a engine larger than the current 265 and the 283 that was planned for 1957. Two different experimental small-blocks, both measuring around 300ci and featuring the same external dimensions as the current stock engine, were developed. For engine A, increasing the bore diameter required joining the bores, creating a casting problem and preventing complete coolant circulation around the cylinder; for engine B, new tools and equipment were needed for crankshaft machining. Additionally, both engines were limited in future increases in displacement and compression.

(Image courtesy of Chevrolet)

The future also anticipated requirements for both passenger cars and trucks. What if the design could be adapted to both? The production volume could warrant the investment in manufacturing facilities while reducing the capital cost per engine. The new engine would have room for future changes in displacement and compression without large retooling expenses, and the cost of added production could be amortized over a longer period of time.

Due to these considerations, the decision was made to start with a clean sheet rather than base the new V8 on the small-block. The new design became known as the W engine.

(Image courtesy of General Motors)

Five new ground rules were established (quoted from the aforementioned article):

  1. Adaptability to a broad range of displacement with a minimum number of different parts
  2. Overall dimensions compatible with anticipated space limitations of passenger car design
  3. Adaptability to a broad range of compression ratios to match the octane trend of future fuels
  4. Provisions for mounting accessories required for both passenger cars and trucks
  5. Flexibility in the use of machine tools to accommodate future engine modifications
(Image courtesy of Chevrolet)

Chevrolet introduced the W engine (Turbo-Thrust for passenger cars, Workmaster for trucks) for 1958, becoming the first engine developed for both cars and trucks that met future, anticipated needs. It was produced through 1961, the same year the 409 was introduced. The 409 lasted through January 1965, upon which it was replaced by the 396 “Mark IV” big-block.

Now go tell your friends and change the trajectory of history!

Previous Post

AutoHunter Spotlight: 1984 GMC Caballero

Next Post

The Acura CL Type-S is a Forgotten Performance Gem

Next Post
The Acura CL Type-S is a Forgotten Performance Gem

The Acura CL Type-S is a Forgotten Performance Gem

Popular News

  • Expert Insights: Q&A with FCAI chief executive Tony Weber
  • Hyundai expects an exodus of brands due to new Australian emissions regulations
  • 2025 Hyundai Santa Fe price and specs
  • The Semantics of Special-order Cars
  • Cars and Fashion at the Saint Louis Art Museum
  • 2025 Mitsubishi ASX ES Street review
  • AutoHunter Spotlight: 1966 Chevrolet Chevelle Wagon
  • Pick of the Day: 1972 Chevrolet Nova SS
  • QOTD: What’s Your Favorite Car Color?

Latest News

  • Expert Insights: Q&A with FCAI chief executive Tony Weber
  • Hyundai expects an exodus of brands due to new Australian emissions regulations
  • 2025 Hyundai Santa Fe price and specs
  • The Semantics of Special-order Cars

Main Categories

  • Interior News
  • Stylish Home
  • Auto Maintenance
  • Auto News
  • Auto insurance

About Drive Home Solutions

  • Contact Us
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Contact Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Interior News
  • Stylish Home
  • Auto Maintenance
  • Auto News
  • Auto insurance

×    

    Stay updated with the latest news, exclusive offers, and special promotions. Sign up now and be the first to know! As a member, you'll receive curated content, insider tips, and invitations to exclusive events. Don't miss out on being part of something special.


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.